Though Asana edged the price round, there isn’t much to choose between them and neither is expensive enough to be off-putting. Overall, Wrike isn’t hard to use, but you’ll have to think about it from time to time and you’ll need to consult the help pages on occasion. If it saves you time, it’s saving you money, but it’s up to you to take advantage of its features and get as much value out of it as possible. That is no criticism of you, but the software. They’re top tools that have much to like about them, but when it comes down to it, you’re only going to be signing up with one. Useful article thank you. With wider margins of victory in its winning rounds, the referee lifts Wrike’s arm into the air and the crowd go bananas (feel free to do so in the comments section below). A variety of views helps you see how things are going. Asana has unlimited storage space, though, which is a big plus. Not every tool marks your successes by sending colorful animals flying across the screen. It’s compliant with the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield and its EU servers are compliant with the General Data Protection Regulation. Take a look at our best password managers article if keeping track of them all is proving to be a chore.
Asana and Wrike have free and inexpensive lower tiers, so what’s going to seperate them is what’s on offer at each level. Wrike has an excellent feature set and some of the best security options around. Let’s discuss how we’ll separate them. Asana is solid on security and privacy, but Wrike’s broader range of features sees it landing the heavier punches in this round. There are calendar and timeline views, as well, so you can schedule everything easily. They let you configure it for things such as product launch, project management or a helpdesk system. Let’s start with features to see which service offers the broadest range of functionality. Wrike has some of the best security features around. But the pricing section is misleading, as it the pricing itself on the platform. Both scored 90 percent in this area in our reviews, so the first round is going to be close. Wrike’s navigation can be tricky and it’s easy to get lost when finding your feet. There features that are common to both systems, which includes; Task and document management tool Time Machine vs Arq vs Duplicati vs Cloudberry Backup. You also get to try its premium features for a few days if you request a free trial.
It uses soft colors, and the interface is clear and largely self-explanatory. Take a look at our website security article to learn how best to secure your own website. It seems like Wrike goes further and offers more depth in other areas, as well. It’s close, though. That’s good for keeping everyone on the same page. With its time tracking and resource management though, we think Wrike has the edge. You can also create forms that let team members create tasks by filling them in. One reason project management tools are so effective is that they let people view key information as needed, without having to go through the trouble of calling a meeting. Wrike is one of the strongest tools out there, narrowly taking second place in our last roundup of the best project management software. How to Access the Deep Web and the Dark Net, How to Securely Store Passwords in the Cloud, MP4 Repair: How to Fix Corrupted Video Files in 2019, Best Free Video Editor for 2020: HitFilm, Lightworks, Blender & Many More, User Limit: unlimitedPrice: negotiable Details, 15 teammates, basic task management Details, Price per user, task dependencies, forms, custom fields Details, Price per user, custom rules, manager approvals, portfolios Details, Custom pricing and user count, user provisioning, data deletion Details. Setting Up a Fight: Wrike vs Asana. Asana has the advantage in that it’s easier to get started with and those who want to use a platform more casually, without putting time into learning its advanced features, may prefer it.
Asana goes out of its way to make itself pleasant to use. That sounds comprehensive to us. The service also offers a 14-day trial if you want to try the features on its paid plans. Asana and Wrike are fantastic solutions for managing projects that positively impact teamwork, collaboration, file sharing, and tracking of tasks and projects. Wrike vs. Asana: An overview Who is Wrike for? Asana is a friendly tool that we rated highly for usability, as you can read in our Asana review. With unlimited storage being an obvious strong point, Asana’s colorful exterior doesn’t mean it’s short on features. That just gets Asana’s nose in front. Read our Trello beginner’s guide if you want to know more about it. A feature that saves you time can be worth far more than the price of the service, so paying attention to what’s out there can make a big difference to your bottom line. Its free plan is usable, allowing as many projects as you like, and is a great way to dip your toes into the water. That way, you can see what needs to be finished at each step of the way. We’re looking at two of our favorites in this Wrike vs Asana comparison. It has a report generator with a few presets, but also the scope to customize it to output what you need.
Wrike allows you to upload files and comment on them. If you want to see how tasks will affect one another, Wrike will help you do so. Asana is solid on security and privacy, but Wrike’s broader range of features sees it landing the heavier punches in this round. Though Wrike generally has a broader selection of features, Asana offers things at lower tiers. Software developer Andrew Filev founded Wrike in 2006 and it released its beta version of his software that same year to much acclaim. For example, proofing is offered at Asana’s Business tier, but Wrike doesn’t include it until its Marketers tier. It has plenty of integrations, including Zapier, which acts as an intermediary to many applications. It offers plenty, with full dependencies and several useful views for planning your projects.
If you’re putting your business-critical data online, you need to be sure you can trust the service that manages it. Asana takes this round, leaving things level at one apiece. Your email address will not be published. Because they both have free tiers and free trials of their more expensive plans, there’s nothing to stop you from putting them to the test. Wrike vs Asana. © 2007-2020 CommQueR.com We are a professional review site that receives compensation from the companies whose products we review. If you want to sign up for one of those, it costs $9.80 a month for up to 15 users, with the price increasing at each higher tier. 1. After that, like Wrike, it has many templates to help you get started. That’s the only way we can improve. If you’re on a budget, take a look at our Freedcamp review to see a service that offers plenty at a low price. e.g. Asana is nicer to look at than Wrike and has fun features, but that doesn’t mean it’s easier to use. Though Wrike’s top tier is the most expensive from the two platforms, the service has a free offering and two tiers that correspond closely to Asana on price. For another tool that scores well in this area, take a look at our Smartsheet review. Wrike’s top plans are pricier, but that won’t be a problem if they offer more. Asana also has unlimited storage, with a generous 100MB file-size limit. We’ll look at security, too, because you don’t want your competitors hacking into your website and getting their greasy paws on your plans. The same with Wrike. Looking through the templates can help you get a feel for how to set things up, even if you plan to go your own way later. Wrike is the favorite in this area, having scored 94 percent for security and privacy in our Wrike review, but let’s see how it fares in a direct comparison with Asana.
You can also share data with Salesforce, Jira and Trello. As well as two-factor authentication, which you can read about in our what is two-factor authentication guide, it has plenty of options for those on its top plans. It has SOC certification and participates in bug bounty programs, too, allowing experts to help look for problems and improve its security. Asana offers plenty of reassurance privacy-wise, and it’s compliant with the GDPR and the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield. Wrike has a strong selection of features, beginning with its core task-based structure, which includes subtasks and dependency management.
Asana looks colorful and friendly, but it’s not short on features. Asana has its work cut out. It also takes full daily backups and uses servers in different locations to prevent data loss.
Its custom password settings let you make sure your team members choose strong passwords. That said, Wrike is still looking strong heading into our final round. It’s not just about appearances, though. Because Asana is marginally cheaper and has one or two things on lower tiers that Wrike doesn’t, it wins round three. There’s a network access policy and range of access controls for file storage and invitations. When it comes down to it, features are what you’re paying for with project management software.
Security and privacy are important when using a project management tool. A tool that improves your workflow can be far more valuable than what you pay for it. We’ll focus on several of the key areas that make a difference when choosing a tool for your business, including features, which define what the software can do, and price, which we’d prefer to be less if all else is equal. It’s professional-looking, with a broad feature set and tight security. If you want to use an external service, read our best online storage for teams article for a roundup of what’s out there. You can see how much time is being spent and whether things are being done efficiently. If not, then Asana will get the nod here.
Required fields are marked *, Wrike vs Asana: Choosing the Best Project Management Software for 2020. User-friendly software will help minimize your training costs by enabling people to get up to speed quickly. There are also mobile apps, so you can plan things on the train to work. Asana’s excellent design makes figuring out what to do next a no-brainer. Pricing is always a factor, especially if you have a lot of people on your team. It uses TLS 1.2 with AES 256-bit encryption for data transport and AES 256-bit for data storage too, so your data should be extra safe from cybercrime. Both require a minimum user number to open up the premium feature. Thanks for reading. They are both GDPR compliant in matters of data management and security.
We were never stuck for long, but there’s a learning curve.
If sorting your schedule and eliminating bottlenecks is the reason you’re looking for a project management tool, take a look at our TeamGantt review to learn about another platform that does it well. You can also export your data if you want to get it off the platform, so you aren’t locked in. Payments are usually by credit card, but it offers invoice purchasing to teams of 20 and above, allowing them to pay by bank transfer or check. When it comes to Wrike vs. Asana, there isn’t much to separate them. It’s professional-looking, with a broad feature set and tight security. Most of it is self-explanatory, so you’ll rarely need its help pages when you want to try something new.
You can even leave comments at specific points in videos, making it a great choice if you’re working with them. You can choose your password strength criteria and require users to login using Google or SAML. For business use, though, Wrike wins. Wrike’s cheapest option is 19 cents less a month than Asana’s, but the next tier up is $5 cheaper with Asana.